Home /p.22

Mahler in Manchester: Take Eight

Mahler in Manchester 2010 Logo

The Mahler in Man­ches­ter con­cert se­ries is reach­ing its cli­max as we clam­ber up to the final, vast sym­phonies whose am­bi­tions out­did all pre­de­ces­sors and Mahler 8 is the largest of them all, com­bin­ing the forces of BBC Phil­har­monic, Hallé, Hallé Choir, Hallé Youth Choir and CBSO Cho­rus, not to men­tion con­duc­tor Mark Elder and the eight vocal soloists. The jour­ney has been an in­ter­est­ing one, en­livened by the con­ceit of pair­ing each sym­phony with some new, spe­cially com­mis­sioned music, usu­ally bear­ing some re­la­tion­ship with its sym­phonic cousin. The new works have been var­i­ously suc­cess­ful (as are, of course, the Mahler sym­phonies) and while the hap­less tin­ker­ing of Uri Caine’s piano play­ing fre­quently being swal­lowed by the di­rec­tion­less mélange that was his Scenes from Child­hood pro­grammed along­side Mahler 5 may not have pleased every­one, it is the po­ten­tial for serendip­ity that is ap­peal­ing. Be­sides, as Gus­tav’s grand­daugh­ter Ma­rina notes in the pro­gramme, ‘an open, cu­ri­ous, de­mand­ing ear, will­ing to lis­ten, al­ways search­ing for some­thing lovely, some­thing true in the music of our own time — this is truly ho­n­our­ing Mahler’s music.’

Sun­day night’s pair­ing with Mahler 8 couldn’t have been more fit­ting. The ec­sta­tic re­li­gious el­e­ment of the sym­phony was echoed in a 20-minute im­pro­vi­sa­tion on the Gre­go­rian hymn ‘Veni, Cre­ator Spir­i­tus’, the text of which forms the first part of the Mahler, per­formed by or­gan­ist Olivier Latry. Latry has held one of the four posts as or­gan­ist at Notre Dame de Paris since 1985 and is steeped in the French tra­di­tion of organ im­pro­vi­sa­tion as the main mu­si­cal ac­com­pa­ni­ment to the Catholic mass. This tra­di­tion is strik­ingly mod­ernist when one com­pares it to the litur­gi­cal organ tra­di­tion of the British Isles and Latry’s mu­si­cal an­ces­try can clearly be traced back to the de­vout, if un­ortho­dox, Catholic Olivier Mes­si­aen, who held a sim­i­lar post at the Église de la Sainte-Trinité for 61 years, until his death.

Open­ing with the unadul­ter­ated plain­chant line, which dates from the 9th Cen­tury, Latry quickly set about mov­ing through kalei­do­scopic worlds of tim­bral and mo­tivic vari­a­tion, ex­ploit­ing every pos­si­ble colour and reg­is­ter of the 5,500-pipe Bridge­wa­ter organ. He moved with ease and agility through rau­cous se­quences of chords flung about the pipes to van­ish and re­veal the quiet, air-shak­ing depths of the low­est pedal notes. High bab­bling tex­tures with an al­most elec­tronic feel, rem­i­nis­cent of the gur­gling boys’ voices in Stock­hausen’s Gesang der Jünglinge, segued into gap­ing hor­ror movie chords. The im­pro­vi­sa­tion seemed to be­come a se­ries of in­ter­lock­ing chorales and arias, and its sym­phonic am­bi­tion was clear as the theme re­turned and evolved be­fore burn­ing out in the — only slightly in­con­gru­ous — final, fiery glow of an apoc­a­lyp­ti­cally joy­ous wall of major key sound. That is, of course, pre­cisely how Mahler 8 fin­ishes and de­spite Latry’s note in the pro­gramme that ‘an im­pro­vi­sa­tion must be spon­ta­neous […] I won’t lis­ten to Mahler’s Sym­phony No.8 be­fore the per­for­mance,’ one won­ders whether he may have at least half-planned the end­ing’s spirit.

Mahler’s Eighth Sym­phony is an un­usual work, closer in many ways to an or­a­to­rio than a tra­di­tional sym­phony, but one of the most sur­pris­ing things about Mahler’s music today — a cen­tury since this sym­phony’s first per­for­mance — is its moder­nity. The sym­phony is re­plete with jagged, dis­so­nant lines, com­pos­ite sounds built from cym­bal at­tacks and string de­cays, strange jux­ta­po­si­tions such as choir and way­ward solo vi­o­lin, and of course the har­mo­nium and man­dolins ex­pand­ing the stan­dard or­ches­tral palette yet fur­ther. The first cho­rus of Part Two, gen­tly dis­turb­ing an or­ches­tral still­ness with syl­la­ble-by-syl­la­ble text set­ting, is still stun­ning and was per­formed with great re­straint by the massed choirs, evok­ing Goethe’s awestruck po­etry. The sub­lime quiet of the pre-cli­max final stanza, ‘Alles vergängliche / Ist nur ein Gle­ich­nis’ [Every­thing tran­si­tory / is but an image], was sung with sim­i­lar del­i­cacy. A good vocal soloist is hard to find, let alone eight, but Ger­ald Fin­ley (of course) stood out as Pater Ec­sta­ti­cus. The Cana­dian bari­tone must rarely have so lit­tle to do in a con­cert — just twelve short lines — but his voice and stage pres­ence rarely fail. Sec­ond so­prano Aga Miko­laj, singing the role of the pen­i­tent, also im­pressed with con­trol and feel­ing as she sang ‘Neige, neige / Du Ohne­gle­iche’.

With 121 in­stru­men­tal­ists, 383 cho­rus mem­bers and 8 soloists on stage, Mahler was never going to end the ‘Sym­phony of a Thou­sand’ qui­etly. After the awe-filled hush of ‘Alles vergängliche’ the or­ches­tra grad­u­ally stirs be­fore ris­ing to one of the loud­est and most or­gas­mic fi­nales of the reper­toire. The Bridge­wa­ter Hall can only rarely have been treated to such a grip­ping and phys­i­cally pow­er­ful sound that con­veys the pas­sion and strength of five hun­dred plus per­form­ers emp­ty­ing the last ounces of their en­ergy into those final notes. This is the pas­sage of which Maher wrote, ‘that the uni­verse be­gins to vi­brate and re­sound. These are no longer human voices, but plan­ets and suns ro­tat­ing.’ It was greeted with rap­tur­ous ap­plause and a stand­ing ova­tion.

The sym­phony is ded­i­cated to Mahler’s wife, Alma, and, to re­turn to Mes­si­aen, it is strik­ing how, 40 years be­fore Tu­ran­galîla, the com­bi­na­tion of ec­sta­tic, human love and a be­lief in the holy joy of God re­sulted in a mu­si­cal out­pour­ing on a sim­i­larly large scale. It takes a lot of time, plan­ning and ef­fort to arrange a per­for­mance of this sym­phony — it took Mahler three years after its com­po­si­tion to or­gan­ise the pre­miere — and the col­lab­o­ra­tive ef­forts of BBC Phil­har­monic, Hallé and the var­i­ous choirs should be cel­e­brated as a won­der­ful mu­si­cal gift. It is the turn of the Ninth Sym­phony in a few weeks. It will take quite some­thing to out­shine Sun­day’s per­for­mance.

Wege & Waldstille Performed by Psappha

Wege & Wald­stille, for clar­inet, per­cus­sion, piano, cello and elec­tron­ics, will be premièred by the fan­tas­tic Psap­pha at 17:00 on Fri­day 30 April in the Cosmo Rode­wald Con­cert Hall at the Mar­tin Har­ris Cen­tre for Music and Drama. These guys re­ally know how to play and it’s been an ab­solute plea­sure hear­ing them re­hearse, so come along! The con­cert also fea­tures works by other Uni­ver­sity of Man­ches­ter post­grad­u­ate com­posers (al­most all world premières) — Soo­jung Park’s Look­ing over the Land, Josh Kopeček’s the war­rior fallen, Mauri­cio Pauly’s La Prisa Ed­u­ca­ble and Yvonne Ec­cles’s Mul­ti­ple In­fec­tions.

List­ings: Face­book / Psap­pha / Venue

Wallander: “Not even Stockhausen could have come up with a din like that!”

Wallander: “Not even Stockhausen could have come up with a din like that!”

Raise Your Voice Line-Up Announced

Raise Your Voice Col­lec­tive, which I help run, have just an­nounced the line-up for their sec­ond out­ing of con­tem­po­rary clas­si­cal, ex­per­i­men­tal elec­tron­ics and chilled-out beats at Cen­tro Bar in Man­ches­ter’s North­ern Quar­ter. It’s an ex­cit­ing mix, stretch­ing from Mar­tin Suck­ling’s Pas­sacaglie for cello and elec­tron­ics orig­i­nally writ­ten to make use of the Hy­per­bow de­vel­oped at MIT, via the sor­didly urban an­gu­lar lines and ir­reg­u­lar rhythms of Tom Coult’s Avian Riots, to Steve Py­croft’s Richter VS Dragon, which ap­plies re-mix­ing and mash-up tech­niques to in­stru­men­tal music, and end­ing with a live DJ set from Al Sonar of Hit&Run. Also among the pieces being played will be my piece The Golden Lion Hotel for per­cus­sion and elec­tron­ics.

The night is Fri­day 14 May and takes place as part of the Fu­tureEv­ery­thing Fes­ti­val Show­case. Check out the Raise Your Voice web­site for more de­tails.

A stillness on the ear

At 17:00 on April 30th con­tem­po­rary music group Psap­pha will per­form a new work of mine, Wege & Wald­stille, for clar­inet, hand­held per­cus­sion, piano, cello and elec­tron­ics (see event list­ing). In writ­ing it I thought a fair amount fur­ther about si­lence and near-si­lence in my music, how it can be­have and how it can be­come a con­struc­tion ma­te­r­ial in its own right. Here are a few more thoughts on that sub­ject.

In A Book of Si­lence, Sara Mait­land ob­serves that, ‘Si­lence has no nar­ra­tive. Si­lence in­ten­si­fies sen­sa­tion, but blurs the sense of time.’ Si­lence was one of the first things I came to ex­plore when I started hav­ing music per­formed. Be­fore I had ex­pe­ri­enced the grip­ping vac­uum at the heart of Hel­mut Lachen­mann’s Gran Torso, be­fore I had heard Luigi Nono’s Frag­mente-Stille sparkle on the hori­zon, be­fore I knew how Sal­va­tore Scia­r­rino’s music can tot­ter and weave on the brink of au­di­bil­ity, even be­fore I had read John Cage’s Si­lence or un­der­stood 4’33” in any real way, si­lence was some­thing I dis­cov­ered, un­cov­ered and loved.

Why this isn’t a para­dox­i­cal at­trac­tion for a com­poser to have is sim­ple: as Cage re­alised, there is no such thing as si­lence, at least not in that pure sense of a com­plete ab­sence of any aural stim­u­la­tion. In­stead there is this im­mensely se­duc­tive still­ness that ‘in­ten­si­fies sen­sa­tion’, which, if em­ployed well, draws a lis­tener in, height­ens their con­cen­tra­tion and brings to the fore sub­tleties, struc­tural pos­si­bil­i­ties and novel ex­pe­ri­ences. So, the Ger­man ‘Stille’ and ‘Ruhe’ are per­haps more pre­cise here with their mul­ti­ple con­no­ta­tions cov­er­ing not only ab­solute si­lence, but also its less ex­treme man­i­fes­ta­tions: peace, quiet and still­ness. In the first piece I had per­formed in the UK, Sketches in Si­lence, I found through thought ex­per­i­ment that given the pow­er­fully ex­pec­ta­tion-thwart­ing qual­ity of si­lence in a con­cert hall con­text it was pos­si­ble to sus­tain a min­i­mum of ma­te­r­ial for quite ex­tended pe­ri­ods. This achieved, I think, an in­ter­est­ing du­al­ity of ex­pe­ri­ence as the au­di­ence found them­selves reach­ing a sort of med­i­ta­tive sta­sis but also en­ter­ing a zone of height­ened aware­ness al­low­ing them to dis­cern more oblique struc­tural processes. The lat­ter is I sup­pose akin to the ad­just­ment of our eyes as we hunt for out­lines in the gloom, but au­rally that which we hear at the ex­trem­i­ties seems to bear a crisp­ness and a pres­ence that does not equate to the im­paired blur of dark­ened sight.

At the out­set this in­ter­est drew on a cou­ple of in­spi­ra­tions. The idea of sub­vert­ing ex­pec­ta­tions came from my first thor­ough ed­u­ca­tion in Clas­si­cal tonal­ity. I rea­soned that the repet­i­tive and rel­a­tively sta­tic ma­te­r­ial found in min­i­mal­ist music (specif­i­cally that of Steve Reich, whose music I still find fre­quently ex­cel­lent) shifted the ex­pec­ta­tions of the au­di­ence and al­lowed for the use of ten­sion and re­lease that mir­rored in some sense that of Clas­si­cal tonal­ity, but func­tioned in terms of rep­e­ti­tion and change rather than har­monic pro­gres­sion (which is ar­guably a learnt set of signs re­quir­ing ed­u­ca­tion to per­ceive). Of course, this is some­what sim­plis­tic as Reich’s music can also have a strongly har­monic drive, but I felt that my ex­pe­ri­ence of it was grounded in the rep­e­ti­tion build­ing ex­pec­ta­tion of change (ten­sion) which can then be re­leased in var­i­ous ways pro­vid­ing a com­pelling mu­si­cal dis­course. Hav­ing at the time re­cently read Jerzy Pietrkiewicz’s Other Side of Si­lence: the poet at the lim­its of lan­guage (OUP, 1970), I was in­flu­enced by his sug­ges­tion in re­la­tion to po­etry that

Si­lence re­sem­bles a lis­ten­ing com­pan­ion rather than a place emp­tied of all sounds. It has the at­ten­tive qual­ity of a per­son. What is un­spo­ken may be in­tended and there­fore imply mean­ing.

So, the idea of Sketches in Si­lence, which was def­i­nitely largely an ex­per­i­ment, was to ex­plore the po­ten­tial of si­lence to act sim­i­larly to the re­peated ma­te­r­ial of Reich: the lis­tener goes to a con­cert, ex­pects sound, seeks and con­structs mean­ing from sound, in the ab­sence of ‘per­formed’ sounds  (they are few and far be­tween in this piece) the lis­tener will con­tinue this process in­deed per­haps imag­in­ing some sounds which aren’t there. To push the pos­si­bil­ity of lis­tener-con­structed nar­ra­tives, I also in­cluded some gen­uinely silent ges­tures for the per­form­ers to see whether those might be­come trig­gers for ei­ther imag­ined sounds or for sound to be­come dif­fer­ently source-bonded.

After Sketches in Si­lence, si­lence be­came less of an ex­plicit focus for me and more an area I felt an affin­ity to, some­thing I felt needed ex­plor­ing, but not in soli­tary con­fine­ment, in­stead along­side other kinds of music, within less ex­treme sit­u­a­tions, giv­ing it weight not as ‘an ex­per­i­ment’ but as an in­te­gral part of a wider lan­guage. How does one achieve still­ness, spaces for re­flec­tion with­out los­ing ten­sion? How do you reach si­lence with­out it re­tain­ing its tra­di­tional mean­ings of clo­sure (be it final or in­ter-move­ment)? Can you give si­lence a nar­ra­tive or a lin­ear­ity? All these ques­tions have been part of my re­cent work to var­i­ous ex­tents and this con­tin­ues in Wege & Wald­stille, but I feel as if I am at some­thing of a turn­ing point. I am ex­cited about the start of re­hearsals to hear how what is on paper comes across and to work with the fan­tas­tic play­ers from Psap­pha. It’s al­ways fas­ci­nat­ing to see what you’ve done wrong.

Wege & Wald­stille will be per­formed by Psap­pha at 17:00 on 30th April 2010 at the Mar­tin Har­ris Cen­tre for Music and Drama in Man­ches­ter.

See an index of all posts